Table of Contents

CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay

CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (Supreme Court of India, 2011-08-09) (2011) 8 SCC 497 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 2(f), 8(1)(e), 7(8), 6. Answer-sheets are 'information'; specific clause + reasons mandatory. Evaluated answer-sheets fall within the definition of information under §2(f).

Holding

Answer-sheets are 'information'; specific clause + reasons mandatory.

Ratio

Evaluated answer-sheets fall within the definition of information under §2(f). The CBSE holds them in fiduciary capacity for the candidate, but disclosure to the candidate himself does not breach the fiduciary trust. The PIO must always cite a specific exemption sub-clause and provide reasons under §7(8).

Section(s) applied

Practitioner takeaway

Specific clause + reasons under §7(8); fiduciary defence to applicant's own record rejected.

Citation

Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.