Right to Information Wiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005.

User Tools

Site Tools


important-decisions:court
Translate:

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
important-decisions:court [2020/07/19 11:10] – [Read More] Shrawanimportant-decisions:court [2026/04/19 16:41] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Court Decisions on RTI ====== ====== Court Decisions on RTI ======
-{{ :important-decisions:court-decisions.jpg?nolink |}}+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(important decisions court rti right to information india) 
 +metatag-description=((HC of Delhi) (HC of Delhi) (HC of Delhi) (HC of Delhi) (Division Bench of HC of Delhi) (in r/o 8 Writ Petitions) dated 30-11-2009 (HC of Delhi) dated...)}} 
 + 
 + 
 +{{ :important-decisions:court-decisions.jpg?nolink &621x330|}}
  
 {{indexmenu>:important-decisions:court#1}} {{indexmenu>:important-decisions:court#1}}
Line 25: Line 29:
 | 20.  | Karnataka Information Commission Vs SPIO & Anr on 18-Jan-2013                                                 | Published materials should be obtained from market and Proceedings of Court Case should be obtained as per Court Rules. KIC has no locus to file SLP. Imposed exemplary fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for filing frivolous petition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | {{:important-decisions:sc_2013_kic_vs_karnataka_high_court_-_inf_to_be_obtained_under_court_rules.pdf|Download}}  | | 20.  | Karnataka Information Commission Vs SPIO & Anr on 18-Jan-2013                                                 | Published materials should be obtained from market and Proceedings of Court Case should be obtained as per Court Rules. KIC has no locus to file SLP. Imposed exemplary fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for filing frivolous petition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | {{:important-decisions:sc_2013_kic_vs_karnataka_high_court_-_inf_to_be_obtained_under_court_rules.pdf|Download}}  |
 | 21.  | Public Concern for Governance Trust Vs.State of Maharashtra                                                   | Right to information is implicit and inbuilt in the right and freedom guaranteed to a citizen under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | {{ :important-decisions:pdf_upload-367812.pdf |Download}}                                                         | | 21.  | Public Concern for Governance Trust Vs.State of Maharashtra                                                   | Right to information is implicit and inbuilt in the right and freedom guaranteed to a citizen under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | {{ :important-decisions:pdf_upload-367812.pdf |Download}}                                                         |
-<html> 
-<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> 
-<ins class="adsbygoogle" 
-     style="display:block; text-align:center;" 
-     data-ad-layout="in-article" 
-     data-ad-format="fluid" 
-     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443" 
-     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins> 
-<script> 
-     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 
-</script> 
-</html> 
- 
 ===== High Court RTI Decisions ===== ===== High Court RTI Decisions =====
  
Line 89: Line 80:
 [<>] [<>]
  
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 +===== Status as of 19 April 2026 =====
 +
 +This page is an index of High Court judgments on the Right to Information Act. Entries link to PDFs held in the site's media library. Each judgment should be verified against the current state of the law before citation in an appeal.
 +
 +Entries that turn on Section 8(1)(j) and were decided before 14 November 2025 must be read against the amendment effected by Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. The public interest override within clause (j) has been removed. Public interest reasoning under the RTI Act now operates through Section 8(2). See [[blog:dpdp-rules-2025-amendment-to-rti-act|DPDP Rules, 2025: The amendment to Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act]].
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[important-decisions:start|Case law library]]. Section-wise and forum-wise index.
 +  * [[important-decisions:cic-case-laws|CIC case laws]]. Central Information Commission orders.
 +
 +===== Last reviewed on =====
 +
 +19 April 2026
 +
 +{{tag>rti case-law high-court index}}
  
Was this page helpful?
important-decisions/court.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1