Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Anjali Bhardwaj, IC vacancy, CIC composition, transparency)
+metatag-description=(Government must fill IC vacancies within fixed timelines.)
+metatag-title=(Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India (continuing) — 2018 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India (continuing) ======
+**Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India (continuing)** (Supreme Court of India, 2018-02-15) //WP (C) 436/2018// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 12, 15. Government must fill IC vacancies within fixed timelines. The Supreme Court continues to monitor Information Commission vacancies and disposal rates.
+===== Holding =====
+Government must fill IC vacancies within fixed timelines.
+===== Ratio =====
+The Supreme Court continues to monitor Information Commission vacancies and disposal rates. Government must follow transparent appointment processes and fill vacancies within reasonable time. Full strength of CIC restored in December 2025 after several years of partial vacancies.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 12
+  * Section 15
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+IC vacancy + transparency monitoring; 1 CIC + 10 ICs strength restored Dec 2025.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** WP (C) 436/2018
+  * **Court:** Supreme Court of India
+  * **Date:** 2018-02-15
+  * **Outcome:** ongoing
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** WP (C) 436/2018
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sc 2018}}

Was this helpful? — views