Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Anjali, PMAY-G, SECC, Awaas+, Allahabad HC)
+metatag-description=(PMAY-G inclusion despite SECC exclusion when Awaas+ ground verification supports.)
+metatag-title=(Anjali v. State of UP — 2024 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Anjali v. State of UP ======
+**Anjali v. State of UP** (Allahabad High Court, 2024-01-22) //CWP/2024/000789// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section PMAY-G. PMAY-G inclusion despite SECC exclusion when Awaas+ ground verification supports. Where the petitioner was excluded from SECC-2011 but Awaas+ ground verification clearly established eligibility, the Court directed PMAY-G inclusion.
+===== Holding =====
+PMAY-G inclusion despite SECC exclusion when Awaas+ ground verification supports.
+===== Ratio =====
+Where the petitioner was excluded from SECC-2011 but Awaas+ ground verification clearly established eligibility, the Court directed PMAY-G inclusion. Since 2018, MoRD circulars require Awaas+ verification to supplement SECC for PMAY-G beneficiary identification.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section PMAY-G
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+SECC-2011 not final bar; Awaas+ ground verification paramount.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CWP/2024/000789
+  * **Court:** Allahabad High Court
+  * **Date:** 2024-01-22
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CWP/2024/000789
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-ald 2024}}

Was this helpful? — views