Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Karnail Singh, PMAY-G, subsidy delay, 9% interest, Punjab)
+metatag-description=(PMAY-G subsidy delay 18+ months attracts 9% interest p.a.)
+metatag-title=(Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab — 2024 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab ======
+**Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab** (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2024-04-03) //CWP/2024/006789// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section PMAY-G. PMAY-G subsidy delay 18+ months attracts 9% interest p.a. Where PMAY-G subsidy installments were delayed by more than 18 months without satisfactory explanation, the Court directed payment of the outstanding amount with 9% per annum simple interest.
+===== Holding =====
+PMAY-G subsidy delay 18+ months attracts 9% interest p.a.
+===== Ratio =====
+Where PMAY-G subsidy installments were delayed by more than 18 months without satisfactory explanation, the Court directed payment of the outstanding amount with 9% per annum simple interest. Citizen Charter timelines are enforceable obligations.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section PMAY-G
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+Compensation framework for delayed welfare payments.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CWP/2024/006789
+  * **Court:** Punjab & Haryana High Court
+  * **Date:** 2024-04-03
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CWP/2024/006789
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-pnh 2024}}

Was this helpful? — views