Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Khalid, CP Delhi, §8(1)(g), PVR, Delhi Police)
+metatag-description=(Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting.)
+metatag-title=(Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi — 2017 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi ======
+**Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi** (Central Information Commission, 2017-06-14) //CIC/SA/A/2017/000456// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8(1)(g), 10. Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting. Delhi Police directed to disclose the police-verification file noting in respect of a passport application.
+===== Holding =====
+Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting.
+===== Ratio =====
+Delhi Police directed to disclose the police-verification file noting in respect of a passport application. The §8(1)(g) defence is not available against the applicant's own record. Severability under §10 applied.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 8(1)(g)
+  * Section 10
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+§8(1)(g) defence rejected; severability applied.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CIC/SA/A/2017/000456
+  * **Court:** Central Information Commission
+  * **Date:** 2017-06-14
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CIC/SA/A/2017/000456
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases cic 2017}}

Was this helpful? — views