cases:pmay-status-hc-del-2025
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:pmay-status-hc-del-2025 [2026/04/23 01:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Delhi High Court — PMAY application status (2025) — 2025 — RTI case law)}} | ||
| + | ====== Delhi High Court — PMAY application status (2025) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Delhi High Court — PMAY application status (2025)** (Delhi High Court, 2025-06-15) // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Holding ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4. Delhi High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2010-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section(s) applied ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Section 4 | ||
| + | * Section 7 | ||
| + | * Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii) | ||
| + | * Sub-section 7(1) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Practitioner takeaway ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Citation: | ||
| + | * **Court:** Delhi High Court | ||
| + | * **Date:** 2025-06-15 | ||
| + | * **Outcome: | ||
| + | * **Reporter / Cause-list: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
cases/pmay-status-hc-del-2025.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
