Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(PMAY, Awaas+, DBT)
+metatag-description=(PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4)
+metatag-title=(Madhya Pradesh High Court — PMAY application status (2021) — 2021 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Madhya Pradesh High Court — PMAY application status (2021) ======
+**Madhya Pradesh High Court — PMAY application status (2021)** (Madhya Pradesh High Court, 2021-06-15) //HC-MP/2021/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 4, 7. PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4. PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4.
+===== Holding =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4
+===== Ratio =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4. Madhya Pradesh High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2015-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 4
+  * Section 7
+  * Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii)
+  * Sub-section 7(1)
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** HC-MP/2021/typology
+  * **Court:** Madhya Pradesh High Court
+  * **Date:** 2021-06-15
+  * **Outcome:** varied
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** HC-MP/2021/typology
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-mp 2021}}

Was this helpful? — views