Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Saroj Devi, PMAY-G, BPO, Patna HC, mandamus)
+metatag-description=(Mandamus to BPO for PMAY-G installment release; Rs. 10,000 cost.)
+metatag-title=(Saroj Devi v. State of Bihar — 2023 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Saroj Devi v. State of Bihar ======
+**Saroj Devi v. State of Bihar** (Patna High Court, 2023-07-19) //CWP/2023/004567// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section PMAY-G. Mandamus to BPO for PMAY-G installment release; Rs. 10,000 cost. Where PMAY-G installment was delayed beyond the 90-day Operational Guideline timeline without recorded reason, mandamus issued to the Block Programme Officer (BPO) to release the installment within 7 days.
+===== Holding =====
+Mandamus to BPO for PMAY-G installment release; Rs. 10,000 cost.
+===== Ratio =====
+Where PMAY-G installment was delayed beyond the 90-day Operational Guideline timeline without recorded reason, mandamus issued to the Block Programme Officer (BPO) to release the installment within 7 days. Rs. 10,000 cost awarded against the State.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section PMAY-G
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+BPO bound by PMAY-G timelines; cost for delay.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CWP/2023/004567
+  * **Court:** Patna High Court
+  * **Date:** 2023-07-19
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CWP/2023/004567
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-pat 2023}}

Was this helpful? — views