Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(§8(1)(g), PVR, Sukhdev, police verification, passport)
+metatag-description=(Police verification report disclosable to applicant.)
+metatag-title=(Sukhdev v. SP Karnal — 2016 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Sukhdev v. SP Karnal ======
+**Sukhdev v. SP Karnal** (Central Information Commission, 2016-08-22) //CIC/SA/A/2016/000123// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8(1)(g), 10. Police verification report disclosable to applicant. The Police Verification Report (PVR) of the applicant is the applicant's own record.
+===== Holding =====
+Police verification report disclosable to applicant.
+===== Ratio =====
+The Police Verification Report (PVR) of the applicant is the applicant's own record. §8(1)(g) protects only third-party informants and confidential sources, not the applicant. PIO directed to disclose; severability under §10 applied.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 8(1)(g)
+  * Section 10
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+§8(1)(g) protects third-party informants only, not applicant's own PVR.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CIC/SA/A/2016/000123
+  * **Court:** Central Information Commission
+  * **Date:** 2016-08-22
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CIC/SA/A/2016/000123
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases cic 2016}}

Was this helpful? — views