cases:sushil-kumar-rpo-bhopal-cic-2018
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:sushil-kumar-rpo-bhopal-cic-2018 [2026/04/23 01:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Compensation Rs. 5,000 awarded under §198b for passport delay.) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal — 2018 — RTI case law)}} | ||
| + | ====== Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal** (Central Information Commission, 2018-04-19) // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Holding ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compensation Rs. 5,000 awarded under §19(8)(b) for passport delay. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where passport dispatch was delayed without reasonable cause beyond the Citizen Charter timeline, compensation under §19(8)(b) of the RTI Act of Rs. 5,000 was awarded to the applicant. Compensation must be specifically prayed in the appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section(s) applied ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Section 19(8)(b) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Practitioner takeaway ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compensation under §19(8)(b) is real remedy; quantify loss in appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Citation: | ||
| + | * **Court:** Central Information Commission | ||
| + | * **Date:** 2018-04-19 | ||
| + | * **Outcome: | ||
| + | * **Reporter / Cause-list: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
cases/sushil-kumar-rpo-bhopal-cic-2018.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
