Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(information commission, composition, namit sharma review)
+metatag-description=(Restored Government-nominated IC composition; preserved reasoned-orders requirement.)
+metatag-title=(Union of India v. Namit Sharma (Review) — 2014 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Union of India v. Namit Sharma (Review) ======
+**Union of India v. Namit Sharma (Review)** (Supreme Court of India, 2014-09-03) //(2014) 14 SCC 519// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 12, 15. Restored Government-nominated IC composition; preserved reasoned-orders requirement. The 2013 directive of judicial-only IC composition was modified.
+===== Holding =====
+Restored Government-nominated IC composition; preserved reasoned-orders requirement.
+===== Ratio =====
+The 2013 directive of judicial-only IC composition was modified. Government may nominate ICs as per the original Act, but the requirement that orders be reasoned and on merits is preserved.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 12
+  * Section 15
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+IC composition as in Act; §19(8) reasoned-order standard preserved.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** (2014) 14 SCC 519
+  * **Court:** Supreme Court of India
+  * **Date:** 2014-09-03
+  * **Outcome:** disposed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** (2014) 14 SCC 519
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sc 2014}}

Was this helpful? — views