Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Vinubhai Malaviya, Magistrate supervision, §156(3) CrPC, FIR)
+metatag-description=(Magistrate has continuing supervisory role over investigation.)
+metatag-title=(Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat — 2019 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat ======
+**Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat** (Supreme Court of India, 2019-10-16) //(2019) 17 SCC 1// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section Magistrate supervision. Magistrate has continuing supervisory role over investigation. The Magistrate has a continuing supervisory role over police investigation under §156(3) and §173(8) CrPC.
+===== Holding =====
+Magistrate has continuing supervisory role over investigation.
+===== Ratio =====
+The Magistrate has a continuing supervisory role over police investigation under §156(3) and §173(8) CrPC. Further investigation can be ordered even after submission of police report. Useful complement to RTI for FIR-not-registered cases.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section Magistrate supervision
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+Magistrate can order further investigation; complements §156(3) jurisdiction.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** (2019) 17 SCC 1
+  * **Court:** Supreme Court of India
+  * **Date:** 2019-10-16
+  * **Outcome:** disposed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** (2019) 17 SCC 1
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sc 2019}}

Was this helpful? — views