duplicate-marksheet-rti
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | duplicate-marksheet-rti [2026/04/23 02:08] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Duplicate mark-sheet / degree request is delayed by university. RTI to Controller of Examinations + escalation. Template + case law (2026).) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Duplicate Mark-sheet RTI — issue of certified copy (2026))}} | ||
| + | ====== Duplicate Mark-sheet RTI — issue of certified copy (2026) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | Replacement of lost / damaged academic certificates is governed by university statutes — typically 30-90 days. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this RTI works ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Replacement of lost / damaged academic certificates is governed by university statutes — typically 30-90 days. RTI to the Controller of Examinations is the enforcement route for breaches. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Legal framework ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **RTI Act, 2005** §6, §7(1). | ||
| + | * **University Statutes / Bye-Laws** on duplicate-issue procedure. | ||
| + | * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — academic records disclosable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== RTI template — copy & file ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To: | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer (PIO), | ||
| + | [Office name + address]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: RTI under §6 — Duplicate Mark-sheet query | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under the RTI Act, 2005, kindly provide: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Status of duplicate mark-sheet / degree request dated [DATE], for | ||
| + | | ||
| + | 2. Reason for delay beyond [TIMELINE under bye-laws]. | ||
| + | 3. Status of indemnity bond, FIR copy, affidavit submitted. | ||
| + | 4. Date of dispatch and tentative receipt date. | ||
| + | 5. Citizen Charter timeline of the university for duplicate-issue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rs. 10 IPO enclosed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | [Name] | ||
| + | [Address + phone + email] | ||
| + | [Date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Escalation timeline ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Day 31** — First Appeal. | ||
| + | * **Day 76** — Second Appeal to SIC. | ||
| + | * **Parallel** — Vice-Chancellor grievance cell. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law anchors ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — Academic records are information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Forgetting indemnity bond / police FIR for lost original. | ||
| + | * Filing to college instead of university. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is FIR mandatory for lost original? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes — most universities require FIR copy + indemnity bond + affidavit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Cost of duplicate? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Typically Rs. 500-2000 + RTI fee Rs. 10. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:faq|RTI — 25 questions answered]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * RTI Act, 2005 — full text. | ||
| + | * Citation chain in body. | ||
| + | * Citizen Charter of the relevant authority. | ||
| + | * Case-law database at [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
duplicate-marksheet-rti.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
