Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(section 19 8 rti,faa powers rti,appellate powers rti act,faa remand rti,faa compensation rti,section 19 8 appellate authority)&metatag-description=(The full menu of appellate powers under Section 19(8) of the RTI Act — direct disclosure, remand, compensation, structural orders, penalty recommendation. How and when each is used.)}}
+====== Section 19(8) — Appellate Powers of FAA and Commission ======
+{{ :social:auto:faa-section-19-8-powers.png?direct&1200 |Section 19(8) powers — RTI Wiki}}
+{{page>snippets:dpdp-banner}}
+<WRAP info>
+**What Section 19(8) authorises.** A menu of eight powers available to the First Appellate Authority and the Information Commission. Understanding which power fits which situation is the difference between a rubber-stamp order and a craftsman's disposal.
+</WRAP>
+===== Legal framework =====
+**Section 19(8)** — In its decision, the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission **or the appellate authority**, as the case may be, has the power to:
+  - Require the public authority to take any such steps as may be necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of this Act, including —
+    * by providing access to information, if so requested, in a **particular form**;
+    * by appointing a **Public Information Officer** where none exists;
+    * by **publishing** certain information or categories of information;
+    * by making necessary **changes to its practices** in relation to the maintenance, management and destruction of records;
+    * by **enhancing the provision of training** to officers on the right to information;
+    * by providing it with an **annual report** as prescribed in Section 4(1)(b);
+  - Require the public authority to **compensate** the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered;
+  - Impose any of the **penalties** provided under this Act (CIC/SIC only, not FAA);
+  - **Reject** the appeal.
+===== Power-by-power guide =====
+==== 19(8)(a)(i) — Direct disclosure in a particular form ====
+The most-used power. Direct the PIO to provide the information in the form requested — certified copy, inspection, digital format.
+**Example order paragraph.**
+> //"In exercise of Section 19(8)(a)(i), the PIO is directed to provide certified copies of the running-bill register for Contract No. XXX, for the period April 2023 to March 2024, within 15 working days of receipt of this order. Fee at Rs. 2 per page is payable by the appellant."//
+==== 19(8)(a)(ii) — Appoint a PIO where none exists ====
+Used where the public authority has not designated a PIO and the applicant has been rebuffed. Rare but occasionally invoked for local bodies and smaller authorities.
+==== 19(8)(a)(iii) — Direct publication ====
+The "Section 4 enforcement" power. Where the authority has not complied with proactive-disclosure obligations, direct publication of specific categories — budget, beneficiary list, tender schedule.
+**Example.** Directing a municipal corporation to publish its ward-wise spending register on its website.
+==== 19(8)(a)(iv) — Records-management changes ====
+Where the underlying problem is poor record-keeping — direct the authority to digitise, maintain a proper register, or change destruction schedules.
+==== 19(8)(a)(v) — Training direction ====
+Where PIO/FAA decisions show systematic misunderstanding of the Act — direct the authority to conduct training. Often paired with a date for compliance report.
+==== 19(8)(a)(vi) — Annual report compliance ====
+Where the authority has not submitted the statutory annual report under Section 4(1)(b). Direct submission within a timeline.
+==== 19(8)(b) — Compensation ====
+**Underused.** Order the public authority to compensate the complainant for loss or detriment suffered. Amounts vary; commissioner orders have ranged from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 50,000 depending on documented loss.
+**Example.** Where deemed refusal caused the applicant to miss a statutory deadline (e.g., appeal window on a land matter) and suffer a documented financial loss.
+==== 19(8)(c) — Penalty under Section 20 (Commission only) ====
+Commission power only. FAA cannot impose Section 20 penalty but can **recommend** it in the appeal order for the Commission's subsequent consideration.
+==== 19(8)(d) — Reject the appeal ====
+Dismiss the appeal where: time-barred without sufficient cause, ground not raised before the PIO, or PIO's reply is legally sustainable on review.
+===== When to use which — the decision matrix =====
+|= Finding |= Typical power |
+| PIO's reasoning is sound | 19(8)(d) — reject |
+| PIO's reasoning is partially sound | 19(8)(a)(i) — direct partial disclosure |
+| PIO missed Section 11 notice | Set aside; remand (inherent appellate power + 19(8)(a)) |
+| PIO gave deemed refusal | 19(8)(a)(i) — direct disclosure + recommend Section 20 |
+| Authority has no PIO | 19(8)(a)(ii) — direct appointment |
+| Section 4 not complied | 19(8)(a)(iii) — direct publication |
+| Records-management deficient | 19(8)(a)(iv) — practice changes |
+| Systemic pattern of denials | 19(8)(a)(v) — training direction |
+| Documented applicant loss | 19(8)(b) — compensation |
+===== Remand — the inherent power ====
+Though not explicitly in Section 19(8), the FAA's inherent appellate power allows **remand** to the PIO for procedural cure (Section 11 notice, Section 10 severability, fresh speaking reply). Remand is preferable where the FAA cannot decide without the procedure being completed.
+**Example remand order.**
+> //"The PIO is directed to issue Section 11 notice within 5 days of receipt of this order, consider the third party's representation within 10 days, and issue a fresh speaking reply within 40 days of the original RTI application. Time between the filing of this appeal and the date of this order shall not count against the PIO for deemed-refusal purposes."//
+===== Drafting pointers =====
+  * **Name the sub-section.** "In exercise of Section 19(8)(a)(i)…" — not just "directed".
+  * **Specify compliance timelines.** 15 working days is the common standard.
+  * **Copy to the Head of Office** for accountability.
+  * **Keep compensation quantified** — specific amount, not "appropriate compensation".
+  * **Structural orders (iii-v)** should carry a compliance-report date.
+===== Common mistakes =====
+  * **Generic "appeal allowed"** without citing the specific power.
+  * **Ordering penalty as FAA** — the FAA cannot; only the Commission can.
+  * **Vague timelines** ("at the earliest") — unenforceable.
+  * **No copy to Head of Office** — reduces likelihood of compliance.
+  * **Missing compensation opportunity** — genuine applicant losses underawarded.
+===== Case law =====
+  * //CIC orders enforcing Section 4 under 19(8)(a)(iii)// — multiple.
+  * //DoPT directions//: FAAs are quasi-judicial; powers must be exercised with reasoned orders.
+  * //Bhagat Singh v. CIC// (Delhi HC 2008) — appellate body has wide remedial powers.
+===== FAQs =====
+**Q1. Can the FAA order compensation without quantifying?**\\ The FAA may order "compensation for the loss suffered" with the authority to determine the quantum; better practice is to specify an amount.
+**Q2. Who enforces the FAA order?**\\ The PIO and Head of Office. If unenforced, the applicant escalates to Second Appeal before the Commission.
+**Q3. Can the FAA set a deadline shorter than 15 days?**\\ Yes, in life/liberty cases or where the information is time-critical.
+===== Conclusion =====
+Section 19(8) is a toolbox, not a single tool. Use the right power for the right finding, cite the sub-section, specify timelines, and the order becomes not just a decision but a compliance document.
+===== Related reading =====
+  * [[:faa-speaking-order-guide|FAA speaking-order guide]]
+  * [[:faa-appellate-review-checklist|FAA review checklist]]
+  * [[:faa-first-appeal-timelines|First Appeal timelines]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO & FAA knowledge base]]
+===== Sources =====
+  * RTI Act, 2005, Sections 19(8), 20
+  * //Bhagat Singh v. CIC// (Delhi HC 2008)
+  * CIC orders on 19(8) powers
+----
+//Last reviewed: 21 April 2026.//
+{{tag>faa section-19-8 appellate-powers remand compensation}}

Was this helpful? — views