Ask yourself one question before drafting.

Am I asking for a document, or am I asking for action?

• If the answer is a document (file noting, order, inspection report, complaint status, list, budget), use RTI under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
• If the answer is action (repair a road, sanction a pension, transfer an officer, pay arrears), file a complaint through the department, the public-grievance portal, or the ombudsman for that sector.

Using the wrong tool wastes 30 days under the RTI Act and another 45 days on first appeal. That is 75 days lost before the real work begins.

Ramesh, 68, is a retired school teacher. His pension has not credited for two months. He files a long RTI asking “Why has my pension been stopped and please restore it immediately.” The PIO replies after 28 days saying this is a grievance, not an information request. Ramesh loses a month.

The better path:

1. First, file a complaint at the pension-sanctioning authority or, for Central Government pensioners, at the CPAO. Most pension issues resolve in 15 to 45 days at this stage.
2. If the complaint is ignored, then file an RTI asking for “a copy of the order or the file noting under which pension payment to [name, PPO number] was discontinued in [month]”. Now the PIO must answer in 30 days under Section 7.
3. Use the RTI reply to file a targeted complaint or court petition if still unresolved.

Priya wants to know whether her MP sanctioned a crematorium wall in her ward under MPLADS, and whether it was built.

• She cannot file an RTI that says “tell me if the wall was built and if not, please build it”.
• She can file an RTI asking for “a copy of the sanction order under MPLADS for crematorium boundary wall works in [ward], [constituency] in the financial year 2023-24, along with the utilisation certificate and inspection report”. That is a document request and it is enforceable.

Arjun's neighbour assaulted him. The police station refused to register an FIR.

• RTI is not the right tool to compel FIR registration.
• The correct route is a complaint to the Superintendent of Police under Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (which replaced Section 154(3) CrPC on 1 July 2024). If refused, a magistrate's complaint under Section 175 is available.
• RTI is useful afterwards: “certified copy of the daily diary entry for [date], and the written order on my written complaint of [date] refusing FIR registration”.

An RTI is powerful when you need any of the following.

• A document the government holds: sanction letter, order, file noting, inspection report, tender document, contract copy, attendance register, meeting minutes.
• A list or number: how many applications pending, how many complaints received, how many crores disbursed, how many vacancies, how many FIRs.
• A status that exists on record: the current stage of your pension file, the file movement of your caste certificate application, the officer who signed your appeal order.
• A policy or circular that governs a decision you received.
• The reason a decision was taken (file noting trail), provided the note is on record.

It is free for Below Poverty Line applicants (see Section 7(5)) and costs Rs 10 for all others.

Do not file an RTI for any of these.

• To demand action. “Please fix the road.” “Please pay my arrears.” “Please transfer the officer.” Use a complaint or grievance route.
• To ask a question the government has to research. RTI gives you what is on record. It does not compel officers to prepare a new note, calculate a figure, or offer an opinion.
• To seek legal advice. The PIO cannot tell you what the law means for your case. See FAQ.
• To file a future query. RTI is for information in the records as of the date the request is received.
• Against a private person or private company not substantially financed by the government. See Thalappalam Co-op v. State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 2013).
• To circumvent a court's in-camera order or a judicial sub-judice block. Section 8(1)(b) of the Act blocks such disclosure.

The RTI Act itself has a complaint provision. Section 18 lets you complain directly to the Central or State Information Commission about the PIO if you were wrongly refused, ignored, or misled. That is different from the first or second appeal route under Section 19.

Use Section 18 when the process was wrong, not just the content of the reply. Examples: the PIO never replied, the department refused to accept your application, or the information provided was knowingly false or misleading.

1. Asking for action in an RTI. The PIO will reject it. See the six top rejection reasons.
2. Mixing an RTI with a complaint in the same letter. Keep the two separate. Both get diluted otherwise.
3. Asking “why” questions. Do not ask “Why was my application rejected?”. Ask “Kindly provide a copy of the order and file noting on my application no. [X]”. The reasoning is in the file.
4. Going to the wrong authority. A central department has a central PIO. A state department has a state PIO. See Central vs State RTI: Which Should You File?.
5. Filing the RTI before the complaint. On grievance issues, file the complaint first. Give it 30 days. If ignored, then use an RTI to get the file notings.
6. Skipping the first appeal. If the PIO refuses or delays, your next step is a first appeal to the FAA within 30 days. See the first appeal format.

Yes. Most seasoned practitioners do. The complaint seeks action, and a parallel RTI produces the file notings that either support or demolish the department's response to the complaint. Keep them as two separate letters, sent to the right authority.

No. CPGRAMS is for grievances against Central Government services. It does not compel disclosure of documents. It is faster for resolution but gives you no paper trail. Use both in tandem.

Redraft the application to ask for specific documents relating to your grievance. Do not phrase the request in action language. Then re-file it. If the PIO again refuses, file a first appeal under Section 19(1) within 30 days.

No. The grievance and RTI routes run in parallel. File both, monitor both, keep both letters filed.

Only if the institution is a public authority under Section 2(h) of the Act, which includes bodies that are substantially financed by the government. A fully private school or hospital is not. Instead, use the sector regulator or the consumer forum. See Thalappalam Co-op Bank v. State of Kerala (SC, 2013) and Explanation: substantially financed.

If you still want to proceed with an RTI, use the standard first-RTI template. For complaints, use the grievance portal that matches your problem from the table above. For a refresher on what the Act can and cannot do, read the RTI Act 2005 (as amended) and the RTI FAQ.

• The RTI Act, 2005 (as amended on 14 November 2025)
• 6 Reasons Your RTI Gets Rejected (And Fixes)
• Central vs State RTI: Which Should You File?
• File RTI Online in India: 12 Steps (2026)
• RTI Application Format 2026 (Copy-Paste)
• RTI First Appeal Format (30-Day Rule)
• 25 RTI Questions Answered (2026 Update)

1. Right to Information Act, 2005. Full text at this site and at rti.gov.in.
2. Department of Personnel and Training. Guide on the Right to Information Act, 2005. August 2013 (updated).
3. Central Information Commission, Annual Report 2023-24.
4. Thalappalam Ser. Coop. Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala, (2013) 16 SCC 82.
5. CBSE and Anr. v. Aditya Bandopadhyay, (2011) 8 SCC 497.
6. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in force 1 July 2024), sections 173 and 175.
7. Central Vigilance Commission, Complaint Handling Guidelines (2024).

Last reviewed on: 20 April 2026