Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Post-Article 370 records — J&K HC,High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh RTI,RTI §1,RTI §2,J&K,Article 370,reorganisation,§1,UT)&metatag-description=(Post-2019 reorganisation, the RTI Act 2005 applies to the UTs of J&K and Ladakh; pre-2019 J&K RTI Act 2009 orders remain valid.)}}
+====== Post-Article 370 records — J&K HC ======
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh** · 2022-01-01 · Citation awaited
+</WRAP>
+//Post-2019: Central RTI Act 2005 applies to J&K + Ladakh UTs; pre-2019 J&K RTI Act orders remain valid.//
+===== Case details =====
+^ Court | High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh |
+^ Decided | 2022-01-01 |
+^ Citation | Citation awaited |
+^ Petitioner | Researcher |
+^ Respondent | UT administration |
+^ RTI Act sections | §1, §2 |
+^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
+===== Outcome =====
+Post-2019 reorganisation, the RTI Act 2005 applies to the UTs of J&K and Ladakh; pre-2019 J&K RTI Act 2009 orders remain valid.
+===== Ratio decidendi =====
+Following the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the Right to Information Act, 2005 applies to the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. Orders passed under the superseded J&K RTI Act, 2009 before 31 October 2019 remain valid and appellable under that Act's framework.
+===== Keywords =====
+J&K, Article 370, reorganisation, §1, UT
+===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
+//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
+  * [[/cases/sc-rti-overriding-official-secrets-2016|§22 vs. Official Secrets Act]] (SC 2016)
+  * [[/cases/state-of-up-v-raj-narain-1975-sc|State of U.P. v. Raj Narain]] (SC 1975)
+  * [[/cases/cic-rti-state-cabinet-2020|State-cabinet records — §8(1)(i) applicability]] (CIC 2020)
+  * [[/cases/sc-section-22-mental-health-act-harmony-2020|RTI § 22 harmony with special laws]] (SC 2020)
+  * [[/cases/sp-gupta-v-uoi-1981-sc|S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (Judges' Transfer)]] (SC 1981)
+===== Related =====
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=HC-JK|All High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh rulings in the corpus]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=1|All RTI cases turning on §1]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
+  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
+  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
+  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
+  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
+<WRAP center round alert 95%>
+**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
+</WRAP>
+~~NOCACHE~~
+//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
+{{tag>case-law court-hc-jk section-1 section-2}}

Was this helpful? — views