Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(IRCTC, Sandeep Singh, refund SLA, §4 disclosure)
+metatag-description=(IRCTC must publish refund SLAs on the booking confirmation page.)
+metatag-title=(Sandeep Singh v. UoI — 2023 — RTI case law)}}
+====== Sandeep Singh v. UoI ======
+**Sandeep Singh v. UoI** (Delhi High Court, 2023-09-14) //WP(C) 12345/2023// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005. IRCTC must publish refund SLAs on the booking confirmation page. IRCTC, being a public authority under §2(h) of the RTI Act, is directed to display refund Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) on the booking confirmation page itself.
+===== Holding =====
+IRCTC must publish refund SLAs on the booking confirmation page.
+===== Ratio =====
+IRCTC, being a public authority under §2(h) of the RTI Act, is directed to display refund Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) on the booking confirmation page itself. Transparency at the point of sale is a §4 obligation.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * (general RTI provisions — see ratio)
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+Transparency at point of sale; consumer disclosure under §4 RTI.
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** WP(C) 12345/2023
+  * **Court:** Delhi High Court
+  * **Date:** 2023-09-14
+  * **Outcome:** allowed
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** WP(C) 12345/2023
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-del 2023}}

Was this helpful? — views