Right to Information Wiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005.

User Tools

Site Tools


cases
Translate:
no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


cases [2026/04/21 18:29] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(rti case law database,rti supreme court rulings,rti high court judgments,cic decisions,rti act landmark cases,rti case search,rti adjudication search,information commission orders)&metatag-description=(Search India's landmark Right to Information rulings — Supreme Court, High Courts, and Information Commissions. Filter by Act section, court, year, outcome. Free, editor-curated case-law database maintained since 2005.)}}
 +
 +====== RTI Case-Law Database ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round important 95%>
 +**Faceted search across 160+ curated RTI rulings** — Supreme Court, High Courts and the Central Information Commission. Free. [[:cases:search|Open the search tool →]]
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +{{ :social:auto:cases-hero.png?direct&1200 |RTI Case-Law Database — RTI Wiki}}
 +
 +===== What is here =====
 +
 +An **editor-curated, search-ready case-law database** covering the most-cited rulings on the **Right to Information Act, 2005** — indexed by:
 +
 +  * **Court** — Supreme Court of India, every major High Court, Central Information Commission, State Information Commissions
 +  * **RTI Act section** — §2 through §28, including sub-clauses like §8(1)(j), §8(1)(e), §11
 +  * **Outcome** — applicant allowed, request rejected, partly allowed, remitted
 +  * **Year** — 1975 (//Raj Narain//) to 2025 (post-DPDP rulings)
 +  * **Keyword** — parties, citation, ratio, facts
 +
 +===== How to use =====
 +
 +  - Open **[[:cases:search|the search tool]]**.
 +  - Type a keyword (e.g., //fiduciary//, //cabinet//, //§8(1)(j)//) OR pick filters from the left sidebar.
 +  - Click any case to open the full editorial summary (or the external reported judgment, where we have the link).
 +
 +===== Corpus coverage =====
 +
 +  * **Supreme Court** — every landmark RTI ruling from 1975 onwards, indexed to the specific Act section it turns on
 +  * **High Courts** — Delhi, Bombay, Madras, Kerala, Karnataka, Calcutta, Gujarat, Allahabad, Punjab & Haryana, Rajasthan — rulings most likely to be cited in a First Appeal or Second Appeal
 +  * **CIC Full Bench & CIC** — decisional lines that define working practice: §11 third-party, §8(1)(h) investigation, §8(1)(i) cabinet, §6(3) transfer, the political-parties ruling, and recent directives on GST Council and Judicial Academies
 +  * **SICs** — Maharashtra and Kerala selected landmark state rulings; expanding as coverage builds
 +
 +===== How the data is curated =====
 +
 +Every case entry is:
 +
 +  * **Editor-reviewed** — we do not ingest raw scraped text. Each ratio is compressed from the reported judgment; every sub-section tag is cross-checked; every landmark flag is a deliberate editorial choice.
 +  * **Versioned** — when a later ruling overtakes an earlier one (e.g., //Namit Sharma// → //Namit Sharma Review//), the superseding case is linked and the old entry is marked.
 +  * **Free to use** — search is free, no login, no fee, no rate limit other than basic anti-abuse.
 +
 +===== Coming next =====
 +
 +  * **Scraper-assisted expansion** — automated ingestion of CIC and High Court orders with editorial review, growing the corpus to 500+ cases over 2026.
 +  * **Citation graph** — each case will surface "cited in" and "overruled by" pointers.
 +  * **AI-assisted precedent match** — Phase 2 of the Adjudication System: point a draft PIO reply or FAA order at the corpus and surface the closest precedents. Planned once the corpus exceeds ~200 cases.
 +  * **Download ready-to-cite snippets** — two-line quotable editorial ratios for use in First / Second Appeal filings.
 +
 +===== Limitations =====
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**This is an AI-assisted, editor-curated reference tool. It is not a legal service.** Ratios published here are editorial compressions of reported judgments. Before citing in a PIO order, FAA appeal, CIC/SIC submission, or High Court writ, **always consult the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki does not provide legal advice. The final adjudicatory authority rests with the Commission or Court.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * **[[:cases:search|Case-law search tool]]** — facet + keyword search
 +  * [[:important-decisions:start|Landmark case-law library — editorial]]
 +  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO / FAA Knowledge Base]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated text]]
 +  * [[:cpd:start|PIO / FAA CPD Course]]
 +  * [[:tools:chat|RTI Wiki AI chat]]
 +
 +===== Sources =====
 +
 +  * Supreme Court of India — Supreme Court Reports (SCR), Supreme Court Cases (SCC), Supreme Court Judgments Database (Judis)
 +  * High Courts — respective official judgment archives and //Indian Kanoon//
 +  * Central Information Commission — https://cic.gov.in/orders
 +  * State Information Commissions — individual state portals
 +
 +~~NOCACHE~~
 +
 +//Last reviewed: 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law adjudication database search landmark supreme-court high-court cic}}
  
Was this helpful? views
cases.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1