exam-revaluation-rti
Translate:

Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026)

Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026)

⚠️ DPDP Rules, 2025 (14 Nov 2025) amended Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act — public-interest override now under Section 8(2). Read the note →

· 2026/04/19 05:02 · 0 Comments

After CBSE v.

Why this RTI works

After CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), evaluated answer-sheets are 'information' under §2(f). The candidate can demand the answer-sheet, mark-book extract and evaluator notes via RTI. Most boards moved to a formal reval/recheck/photocopy regime, but RTI remains the safety net for unjustified denials.

  • RTI Act, 2005 §6, §7(1), §2(f).
  • CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — evaluated answer-sheet is 'information'; disclosure to candidate is mandatory.
  • ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — fiduciary defence does not apply to candidate's own record.
  • Conducting body's own bye-laws on revaluation.

RTI template — copy & file

To:
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
[Office name + address].

Subject: RTI under §6 — Exam Revaluation query

Sir/Madam,

Under the RTI Act, 2005 read with CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), kindly provide:

1. Photocopy of evaluated answer-sheet, [EXAM], Roll No. [NUMBER], [SUBJECT].
2. Mark-book / award-list extract showing my marks question-wise.
3. Status of revaluation request dated [DATE], application no. [NUMBER].
4. Comparison of total marks before and after revaluation.
5. Written reasons if revaluation has not changed marks.

Rs. 10 IPO enclosed.

Yours faithfully,
[Name]
[Address + phone + email]
[Date]

Escalation timeline

  • Day 31 — First Appeal to FAA.
  • Day 76 — Second Appeal to CIC / SIC.
  • Parallel — Conducting body's revaluation grievance cell.

Case law anchors

  • CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — Foundational — answer-sheets disclosable to candidate.
  • ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — Examining body's fiduciary defence narrowed to third parties.
  • Kendriya Vidyalaya v. CIC (Delhi HC, 2013) — Internal evaluation records disclosable.

Common mistakes

  • Asking for the evaluator's identity — protected under §8(1)(g).
  • Asking before the bye-law revaluation window opens.
  • Forgetting to enclose original revaluation receipt.

Frequently asked questions

Can I ask for evaluator's name?

No — §8(1)(g) protects evaluator identity. You can ask for the marks-record + answer-sheet copy.

Cost of answer-sheet copy?

Boards charge Rs. 700-1500 for photocopy under their own bye-laws. RTI fee is separate Rs. 10.

Sources

  • RTI Act, 2005 — full text.
  • Citation chain in body.
  • Citizen Charter of the relevant authority.
  • Case-law database at /cases/search.

Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.

Discussion

Enter your comment:
 
Share this article
Was this helpful? views
exam-revaluation-rti.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki