Information required to safeguard life or liberty — emergency situation requiring 48-hour reply.

• RTI Act, 2005 §7(1) proviso — 48 hours for life-and-liberty matters.

To:
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
[Office name + address].

Subject: RTI under §6 — Urgent query

Sir/Madam,

Under the RTI Act, 2005 §7(1) proviso (Life & Liberty), kindly provide
WITHIN 48 HOURS:

1. [INFORMATION SOUGHT — describe specifically].

Reasons for life-and-liberty character: [explain prima facie — e.g., hospital
admission, custodial death threat, missing person, threat of demolition,
imminent eviction, urgent medical record, etc.]

Rs. 10 IPO enclosed. PIO is requested to act under the proviso to §7(1).

Yours faithfully,
[Name]
[Address + phone + email]
[Date]

• Hour 49 — Approach the Information Commission directly under §7(1) proviso violation.
• Parallel — Habeas Corpus / mandamus writ to High Court.

• Various CIC orders on §7(1) proviso — 48-hour deadline strictly enforced; non-compliance = §20(1) penalty.
• Bhagat Singh v. CIC (Delhi HC, 2007) — Speaking-reasons doctrine.
• Lalita Kumari v. UoI (SC, 2013) — FIR registration obligation in liberty cases.

• Misusing the proviso for non-life-liberty matters — penalty risk on applicant credibility.
• Forgetting to state prima-facie life-liberty grounds in the application itself.

Imminent threat to physical life, custodial detention/safety, urgent medical record, eviction with no notice, missing person.

Approach IC directly with proof of service and application copy.

• Charge-sheet RTI
• Hospital negligence RTI
• File RTI online — 12 steps
• RTI — 25 questions answered

• RTI Act, 2005 — full text.
• Citation chain in body.
• Citizen Charter of the relevant authority.
• Case-law database at /cases/search.

Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.