Table of Contents
Amit Kumar Srivastava v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022
Central Information Commission · 2022-09-14 · CIC File No. IK/132956925
Considered an RTI to the Central Vigilance Commission on complaint or advice records.
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2022-09-14 |
| Citation | CIC File No. IK/132956925 |
| Bench | C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h |
| Petitioner | Amit Kumar Srivastava |
| Respondent | Central Vigilance Commission |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(h) |
| Outcome | partly allowed |
Outcome
Considered an RTI to the Central Vigilance Commission on complaint or advice records.
Ratio decidendi
CVC complaint statistics and post-decision advice are disclosable; identity of informants protected under §8(1)(g).
Keywords
central, vigilance, commission
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- CVC / vigilance circulars — CIC (CIC 2020)
- Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2015)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion