Table of Contents
Judicial Academies under RTI — CIC
Central Information Commission · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited
Judicial academies are §2(h) public authorities; curricula, faculty lists, and accounts disclosable.
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2020-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | RTI applicant |
| Respondent | National/State Judicial Academy |
| RTI Act sections | §2(h) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
Outcome
National and State Judicial Academies are 'public authorities' under §2(h); training curricula and expense accounts disclosable.
Ratio decidendi
National and State Judicial Academies, established by the judiciary with State funding, are 'public authorities' under §2(h). Training curricula, faculty lists, research output, and annual accounts are disclosable subject to normal §8 carve-outs.
Keywords
judicial academy, §2(h), CIC, training
This case cites
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Namit Sharma v. Union of India (SC 2012)
- Political party accounts — Kerala HC 2015 (HC-KER 2015)
- Village panchayat accounts — Rajasthan HC (HC-RAJ 2018)
- Union of India v. Namit Sharma (Review) (SC 2013)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion