Table of Contents
Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line
Central Information Commission · 2014-01-01 · Citation awaited
Interviewer names are §8(1)(g) protected; candidate's own score + framework disclosable.
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2014-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Candidate / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | Recruiting body |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(g) |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
Outcome
Interviewer identity protected under §8(1)(g); candidate's own score, rank and general evaluation framework disclosable.
Ratio decidendi
Following Bihar PSC v. Rizwi (SC 2012), the CIC protects interview-panel member identities under §8(1)(g). The candidate's own interview score, the marking framework, and aggregate marks are disclosable.
Keywords
recruitment, interview panel, §8(1)(g), CIC, scores
This case cites
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Search-cum-Selection committee records — CIC (CIC 2016)
- UPSC v. Angesh Kumar (SC 2018)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion