Table of Contents
DPDP 2025 effect on §8(1)(j) — Delhi HC guidance
High Court of Delhi · 2025-12-01 · Citation awaited · ★ Landmark
Post-DPDP 2025: §8(1)(j) exempts personal info absolutely; override by §8(2), not the old proviso.
Case details
| Court | High Court of Delhi |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2025-12-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | RTI applicant |
| Respondent | Public authority |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(j), §8(2) |
| Outcome | Rejected |
Outcome
Post-14-November-2025, §8(1)(j) protects all personal information; public-interest override flows through §8(2).
Ratio decidendi
Following the DPDP Rules, 2025 amendment to §8(1)(j), personal information of any person is exempt from disclosure. The public-interest override moves out of the old §8(1)(j) proviso and into §8(2) as a balancing provision.
Keywords
DPDP 2025, §8(1)(j), §8(2), Delhi HC, personal information
This case cites
- K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (SC 2017)
- Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC (SC 2012)
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC (SC 2012)
- Tax returns of public servants — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2020)
- Vaccination and Co-WIN data — CIC (CIC 2022)
- CBI exemption under §24 — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2013)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion