Table of Contents
Rajeev Mankotia v. CIC (file notings)
High Court of Delhi · 2012-01-01 · Citation awaited
File notings are disclosable; mere internal communication is not cabinet material under §8(1)(i).
Case details
| Court | High Court of Delhi |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2012-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Rajeev Mankotia |
| Respondent | CIC & Anr. |
| RTI Act sections | §2(f), §8(1)(i) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
Outcome
File notings are 'information' under §2(f); §8(1)(i) cabinet-papers exemption does not convert to permanent secrecy.
Ratio decidendi
The term 'information' under §2(f) includes file notings. The cabinet-papers exemption in §8(1)(i) applies narrowly to deliberations of the Council of Ministers and not to every internal note of a department.
Keywords
file notings, §2(f), §8(1)(i), Delhi HC
This case cites
- R.K. Jain v. Union of India (SC 2013)
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- R.K. Jain v. Union of India (SC 2013)
- Cabinet note post-decision — §8(1)(i) — CIC (CIC 2022)
- GST Council — public authority status (CIC) (CIC 2019)
- ICAI v. Shaunak H. Satya (SC 2011)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion