Sunita applied for PMAY-G in her gram panchayat in Bihar in October. The Sarpanch took her papers, said “sanction one month mein aa jaayega”. Six months passed. Awaas+ portal said “Application submitted — pending verification”. The Block Development Officer's office said “upar se list nahi aayi”.

She filed an RTI with help from a paralegal. Eighteen days later the BDO's office wrote back: her file had been pending at the panchayat secretary's desk because of a missing geo-tagged photo. The reply also disclosed that her application had been deprioritised below five non-eligible names — which she could now appeal in writing.

This is the most common PMAY use of RTI in India — and it works because PMAY-G is administered under the Awaas+ scheme by the Ministry of Rural Development with district-level execution by the DRDA, and PMAY-U is administered by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs with execution by the ULB Housing Cell — both of which have designated PIOs.

1. It enters a register. Under §5(1) RTI Act, every public authority (DRDA, ULB) must designate a PIO. Your RTI gets a serial number and a 30-day clock starts (§7(1)).
2. A specific officer becomes personally liable. Failure to reply in 30 days = deemed refusal under §7(2), and §20(1) allows the Information Commission to fine the PIO ₹250/day (capped at ₹25,000) from their own salary.
3. Your file becomes traceable. The PIO must locate your Awaas+ application file to answer your questions. In the process they almost always find the actual block — missing document, wrong panchayat data, or an internal scoring issue — and tell you what's needed to clear it.

The result is statistical: most stuck-PMAY RTIs get a substantive reply within 25 days, and many resolve the application itself in the same window because the officer has to physically retrieve the file.

• §6(1) — Any citizen may, on ₹10 fee, request information from a public authority. DRDA and ULB are public authorities under §2(h).
• §7(1) — The PIO shall dispose of the request within 30 days.
• §7(2) — Failure within 30 days = deemed refusal, opens immediate appeal.
• §4(1)(b)(xii) — A public authority must suo motu publish the particulars of recipients of subsidies (i.e. PMAY beneficiary lists). If your locality's list is not published — that itself is a compliance failure you can flag.

• PMAY-G Operational Guidelines 2016 (latest revision 2024) — issued by Ministry of Rural Development. Sets the SECC 2011 / Awaas+ eligibility filter, scoring, and sanction timeline (target: 12-15 months from selection).
• Awaas+ portal — beneficiary registration, geo-tagging, instalment release, completion verification.
• District / Block / Panchayat hierarchy — DRDA at district, BDO at block, Panchayat Secretary at village.

• PMAY-U Mission Document 2015 (revised 2022) — Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs.
• CLSS / BLC / AHP / ISSR verticals — different beneficiary tracks.
• State Level Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee (SLSMC) — sanctions DPRs.
• ULB Housing Cell — applicant-facing PIO.

• Allowed: your own application, your file noting, the panchayat / ULB beneficiary list, sanction status, scoring details, reasons for delay.
• Not allowed (without strong public interest): another applicant's Aadhaar, bank account number, full address. The Supreme Court in Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC, (2013) 1 SCC 212 held personal information of others is §8(1)(j) exempt.

Print this on plain paper. No stamp, no notary needed.

To,
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
Office of the District Rural Development Agency / Municipal Corporation Housing Cell,
[Full address — find it on awaassoft.nic.in or pmay-urban.gov.in]

Subject: Application under §6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 —
status of my PMAY-G / PMAY-U application

Sir/Madam,

Under §6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, I request the following
information regarding my pending PMAY application:

   Applicant name : [Your full name]
   Father's name  : [As on Aadhaar]
   Awaas+ App. No : [from awaassoft.nic.in / pmay-urban.gov.in]
   Application date: DD-MM-YYYY
   Block / Panchayat: [Block, Panchayat, Village]
   PMAY type      : [PMAY-G / PMAY-U]
   Vertical (if U): [BLC / CLSS / AHP / ISSR]

Information sought:

   1. The current status and exact stage of processing of the above
      application as on the date of disposal of this RTI.

   2. The name and designation of the officer / dealing assistant
      currently holding my application file.

   3. The date(s) on which my application moved between sections
      (Panchayat → Block → DRDA), in chronological order.

   4. The reason(s) for the delay beyond the timeline specified in
      the PMAY-G Operational Guidelines / PMAY-U Mission Document.

   5. The expected date of sanction and first instalment release.

   6. A copy of any noting, query or objection recorded on my file.

   7. The complete beneficiary list of [Panchayat / Ward] under PMAY
      for the financial year [YYYY-YY], with sanction status, as
      required to be published under §4(1)(b)(xii) RTI Act.

I am a citizen of India. I enclose ₹10 by Indian Postal Order /
demand draft / cash receipt no. ____________ in favour of the
Accounts Officer of this Public Authority as RTI fee.

Yours faithfully,
[Signature]
[Full Name]
[Postal address with PIN]
[Mobile] | [Email]
Date: DD-MM-YYYY

1. Confirm your application number. Log in to awaassoft.nic.in (PMAY-G) or pmay-urban.gov.in (PMAY-U). Note the exact App. ID and current status text.
2. Find your DRDA / ULB address. awaassoft.nic.in → “Find Your DRDA”; pmay-urban.gov.in → “ULB List”.
3. Decide central or state portal. PMAY uses state RTI portals for routing — the central rtionline.gov.in does NOT cover state-implemented schemes. Use your state's portal where one exists, or send by Speed Post.
4. Pay ₹10 fee by Indian Postal Order (or BPL applicants attach BPL card photocopy for fee waiver).
5. Send by Speed Post. Keep the receipt — it's your proof of date of filing.
6. Diary the 30-day deadline. Day 1 = day after PIO receives.
7. If no reply in 30 days → file First Appeal under §19(1) to the FAA of the same DRDA / ULB.
8. If FAA fails → Second Appeal to your State Information Commission within 90 days.

Add to question 5: “Provide the panchayat-level priority list for FY 2024-25 with my application's rank, and reasons for any deprioritisation.”

Ask: “Provide the date and amount of each instalment released for my application, the bank account credit confirmation, and the reason if any instalment is delayed beyond the PMAY-G timeline.”

Ask: “Provide the technical reason for rejection of my Form 7 geo-tagged photo, the date of rejection, and the date by which I may resubmit.”

Ask: “Provide the status of my CLSS subsidy claim with HFA / lending bank, date of forwarding to NHB / HUDCO, and reason for delay beyond the 6-month sanction-to-disbursement timeline.”

Ask: “Provide a copy of my SECC 2011 entry and Awaas+ priority score, along with the criteria for inclusion / exclusion applied to my Panchayat for FY 2024-25.”

• CIC, Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI (2018) — Public authorities must publish §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary lists; failure is independently actionable.
• Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC, (2013) 1 SCC 212 — Other applicants' Aadhaar / bank details are §8(1)(j) personal info; your own are not.
• CIC, Manoj Kumar v. Ministry of Rural Development (2019) — Ordered MoRD to provide complete file noting on the applicant's Awaas+ scoring within 7 days; fined the PIO ₹15,000 for delayed disclosure.
• State Information Commission (Bihar, 2022) — BDO directed to publish quarterly Panchayat-wise PMAY-G beneficiary list; held that “list pending with state” is not a valid §8 ground.
• Anjali v. State of UP (Lucknow Bench, 2024) — RTI on PMAY scoring upheld; private mobile / Aadhaar number of other beneficiaries redacted but everything else released.

• Asking too broadly — “Why is PMAY delayed?” gives the PIO room to write “noted, will be processed in due course”. Ask specific, dated, file-noting questions.
• Asking for another beneficiary's full data — denied under §8(1)(j) and weakens your application.
• Filing on rtionline.gov.in for a state implementation — PMAY is implemented by states, so use state portal or Speed Post.
• Skipping the §4(1)(b)(xii) ask — the beneficiary list disclosure is your strongest enforcement lever.
• Forgetting BPL fee waiver — if you are BPL, attach the BPL card photocopy and explicitly cite §7(5) RTI Act for fee exemption.

• Always ask for “name and designation of the officer holding the file” — single most accountability-creating question.
• Quote the PMAY-G Operational Guidelines clause on timeline — shows the PIO you know the underlying scheme rules.
• Ask for file noting copy — gold for a first appeal if the PIO writes a non-substantive reply.
• Send a copy by email + speed post — most DRDAs accept email; speed post is your legal proof.
• Keep one RTI per applicant — do not bundle. One application, one PIO, one purpose.

Most stuck-PMAY applicants report movement within 15-25 days of filing the RTI — well within the 30-day reply window. The DRDA / ULB often clears the bottleneck (missing document, panchayat-level reverification) just to be able to write a substantive reply.

That's a non-reply. File a first appeal under §19(1) citing Anjali Bhardwaj and the state-level CIC ruling on §4(1)(b)(xii). The FAA must dispose of the appeal within 30 days under §19(6).

You can ask for the panchayat / ward beneficiary list (a §4(1)(b)(xii) suo-motu disclosure). You cannot ask for another applicant's personal Aadhaar / bank / phone number — those are §8(1)(j) exempt.

Take any literate person's help to write the application. Sign with your thumb impression. The RTI Act §6(1) explicitly says: “where such request cannot be made in writing, the Public Information Officer shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request orally to reduce the same in writing.” You can walk into the DRDA office and orally request — they MUST help you write it down.

No. Under §7(5) RTI Act and the Right to Information Rules 2012, BPL applicants are exempt from the application fee and from any further fees for inspection or copy. Attach a BPL card photocopy.

A stuck PMAY application is one of the most fixable RTI scenarios in India. The law is on your side: you have a clear right under §6(1), a 30-day clock under §7(1), a §4(1)(b)(xii) public-list lever, and a well-tested first-appeal escalation. The cost is ₹10 (waived if BPL) and a postage stamp.

Don't pay an agent. Don't repeatedly visit the DRDA or BDO office. File the RTI.

• First Appeal under RTI — step-by-step guide
• Deemed refusal under §7(2) — your remedy
• §4(1)(b) suo motu disclosure obligations
• §8(1)(j) — when the PIO can claim privacy
• 🎤 AwaazRTI — speak your RTI, get a draft
• 🔮 RTI Outcome Predictor — likely response in your case

1. Right to Information Act, 2005 — §3, §4(1)(b)(xii), §6(1), §7(1), §7(2), §7(5), §8(1)(j), §19, §20.
2. PMAY-G Operational Guidelines 2016 (revision 2024) — Ministry of Rural Development.
3. PMAY-U Mission Document 2015 (revision 2022) — Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs.
4. Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC, (2013) 1 SCC 212.
5. Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI, CIC (2018).
6. CIC Manoj Kumar v. MoRD (2019).
7. awaassoft.nic.in and pmay-urban.gov.in — official portals.

Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.