Table of Contents
§3 — right available to 'citizens', not 'persons'
Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-01 · Citation awaited
§3 'right to information' is to citizens only; companies / non-citizens lack direct §3 standing.
Case details
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2012-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Foreign national / Non-citizen applicant |
| Respondent | PIO |
| RTI Act sections | §3, §6 |
| Outcome | Rejected |
Outcome
§3 limits the right to 'citizens'; companies, associations, and foreign nationals lack direct standing.
Ratio decidendi
§3 confers the right to information on 'citizens' — interpreted to exclude companies, foreign nationals, and associations as such. An application by a natural-person citizen (including on behalf of an organisation) is the correct route.
Keywords
§3, citizens, standing, companies, foreign nationals
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- ADR v. Union of India (Electoral Bonds) (SC 2024)
- K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (SC 2017)
- State of U.P. v. Raj Narain (SC 1975)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion